News

Exclusive: Government security hut cost 28% more than estimated

Exclusive: Government security hut cost 28% more than estimated
Share this article

The controversial security hut at Government Buildings cost 28% more than originally estimated.

Figures released to WLR under Freedom of Information show the original budget costs in May 2022 came to €1,138,904 (including VAT).

TDs and Senators were told last September that the final costings came to €1.429 million – a difference of €291,096.

Last year Tánaiste Micheál Martin called the cost of the hut “ridiculous” and said he was shocked to hear the figure.

Advertisement

The head of the Office of Public Works (OPW), John Conlon, said at the time he did not believe the cost of the hut was excessive.

The security hut issues was raised with OPW representatives who were questioned in September at the Oireachtas Committee on Finance and Public Expenditure about another controversial project – the €336,000 Leinster House bike shelter.

The Project Business Case Document, dated 31st May 2022, has now been released to Waterford Local Radio under the Freedom of Information Act.

It shows the estimated costs were divided between building costs (€895,070 + VAT = €1,015,904) and Professional Fees (€100,000 + VAT = €123,000) and a figure of 1% for ‘ART’.

Advertisement

The combined figures appear substantially below that which was the final cost - €1,429,000.

Under ‘Costs and Benefits’, the document states that the project was to be co-funded by the Department of Agriculture and the OPW, with each body meeting 50% of the overall costs.

The consultants appointed were Mullarkey Pedersen Architects (for design and tender and construction phases); and Lawler Consulting Engineers (to look after design, tender and installation of mechanical & electrical services of the project.

The 10-page document has a number of lines redacted – including a number under the ‘Anticipated outcomes’ headings; and one under ‘Approvals’, including the name of the person who approved it and the title and organisation that person is with.

There are no specific details in the business case as to how the ‘roof’ was chosen and no references to it. The roof is considered is a stand-out feature.

Under ‘anticipated outcomes’, it outlines how the hut or pavilion as it’s called would provide accommodation for two officers to include counters, four lockers and a small tea station; heating and air conditioning; power and data points for PCs; security screens and access control linked to the main control room in government buildings.

The case also outlines how the new structure would meet the requirements of An Garda Siochana’s security report.

Under the FOI request, a question was asked as to who might have known about details of the project.

Limerick FG TD Patrick O’Donovan was the Minister responsible for the OPW at the time and a question was asked relating to what correspondence might exist between the OPW and the Minister and his staff concerning the refurbishments and contracts associated with such works.

The response says that having consulted with the Minister’s Office within the OPW it was determined that no record exists which is relevant to the specific information sought.

“All records for Patrick O’Donovan were searched and no record of the Security Pavilion was found,” states the response to the FOI query.

John Conlon, the head of the OPW, told the Oireachtas committee meeting last September that “in future, the OPW will ensure that the Oireachtas Commission is fully informed of costs for all elective projects in Leinster House”.

For the latest Waterford News and Sport, tune into WLR News on the hour and download the WLR App for news on demand.

Share this article
Advertisement